data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b1fa/1b1fa0e9faa7495a5c4ab1c89dc3dbfb848021d7" alt=""
I wasn't familiar with the real-life story that the play is based on. In 1934 a group of Ashington miners requested through the Workers' Educational Association for an arts professor to teach them art appreciation. Robert Lyon struggled through an introductory lesson with slides of renaissance art to a nonplussed audience until it was suggested each man should do a lino-cut for the next lesson so they could 'learn by doing'.
Soon they graduated to painting scenes from their lives and slowly their self-taught canvasses were being feted by collectors and known artists with exhibitions both here and abroad. The play started off feeling like a typical class (in all senses of the word) comedy where the miners and teacher clash with vocabularies and outlook which made me wonder for most of the first half why exactly it was so successful.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/135a3/135a35e8c13bb34ffd5dd2ecec0e4cbdc4d2c9e2" alt=""
Soon the Group and, in particular the most feted of them Oliver Kilbourn, find themselves wondering when does patronage become merely patronising. They publicly rebuke their teacher at a gallery launch when they take umbrage at being grouped together as a 'type' of painter, they argue amongst themselves as to what is valid art and more importantly Kilbourn rejects the patronage of a wealthy art collector as he ultimately cannot believe that he can make a living from painting.
Although the Group actually stretched to double figures, Hall has used dramatic licence to focus on five of them. He presents both sides of the argument - you can understand the art patron Helen Sutherland's accusation about the narrow-sightedness of their artistic vision and Lyon's rage at Kilbourn's lack of courage but Hall is definitely on the side of the miners and the play ends with them on the cusp of the new dawn of the post-war Labour government's nationalisation of the mining industry. After their struggle to establish a vision and a purpose to their lives apart from their worth as mining workers it is sadly bittersweet when the play's final moments have them singing a hymn to solidarity as titles flash onto screens reminding us of the failure of future governments to secure their industry and the dropping of Clause IV from the Labour Party's manifesto.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59bce/59bce547e79a3744716169e0489bfb726f1bca5a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/461c0/461c03802af9912df0ad36d9b3dbc8be7806d95d" alt=""
There are nice performances by Lisa McGrillis as a young shopgirl who causes an uproar among the men when Lyon hires her to pose naked for a life study class and Philippa Wilson as the wealthy collector Helen Sutherland who gives the men the opportunity to experience galleries and modern art but who leaves them for new artistic pastures.
There is a small exhibition in the Lyttleton circle foyer of the Group's work so now is a perfect time to catch this enjoyable and thought-provoking play.
No comments:
Post a Comment